What are the best videos and other materials available which explain harms of #chatcontrol to educate our politicians?

Privacy and Security Discussions
1

This is a map from 6 months ago visualizing status of #chatcontrol law:

chatcont-20251212
chatcont-202512121024Ă—1024 143 KB

During last 6 months (2025 January - June) the president of EU Council was Poland (in the green color - they were against mass surveillance), but now Denmark (radical supporter of the law - in red) have taken presidency. Denmark want to rally & pass this law around October 14 (more: Patrick Breyer: "🇬🇧On the very first day of its EU Council Preside…" - digitalcourage.social)

(P.S. Curious question - why Denmark support the law, and Poland oppose it? My guess is that Denmark forgot dangers of authoritarianism and Poland still remembers it in recent/current history. Citizens of Denmark trust the government and the government trusts itself to surveil everyone, but Poland was under authoritarian regime 35 years ago, plus their previous government was also authoritarian wannabe, and can take power again next time, so they are more careful giving government such new mass surveillance capabilities)

My country is in red - I wonder how to influence position of my government? I could send politicians some educational materials, but what to send exactly which is simple & quicker to understand?

Privacy community may have intuitive understanding about dangers of laws like #chatcontrol, but other people (like politicians, who deal with countless of other important issues at once) does not. Mass media is also silent on the issue in my country. Regular people also don’t know about this. And politicians instead are educated (lobbied) by powerful interest groups on what decisions to make (in this case, that would be law enforcement agencies). Many politicians in my country still may never heared about the dangers of this law (as it is EU level issue, so politicians often are not directly exposed to negotiations).

Politicians are very smart and many do care, but they also need to be aware of issue and see that voters care as well. Our local politicians have quite direct power to stop it today. I am sending some clips I found, where members of European Parliament explain about their job from the inside:

If more people would tell members of their local parliaments in their countries about the problems of this law, then they could influence positions of governments, and when governments could vote wisely in the Council during these next 6 months of Danish (and other future) presidency. Finally, if there would be more green countries, then this law could finally be stopped. Now they see that the difference to pass this is very small, so they keep pushing it for many years.

1 Like
2

I don’t have much experience with this area, but I would see if there are organizations like the EFF in Europe or in your country to link up with them. Not only can they give direction for what action to take or how to organize, but they are also the best lobbyists you can have for your cause. Besides that I would see if any of the privacy respecting companies operating in the Europe like Mullvad or Proton are doing an advocacy that you can link up with.

After that, calling your representative regularly is maybe the best thing you can do. That and trying to convince the people around to come closer to your position. It’s not great work and sometimes it feels like you may not be making progress, but that’s the kind of thing that will have an effect. Not that I’m an expert - maybe other community members or those organizations can point to something more effective.

Organizing is a whole new world to me, so I’m happy to learn more!

Sorry I can’t think of any particular resources that might convince these guys.

3

Using organisations already working to advocate for better privacy is by far the best option simply due to resources.

The other thing I’d work with at this point is just the history of how well these things turned out.
Unfortunately these are mostly a result of the US at this point.

The main thing to me is the Salt Typhoon hacks. Where a communication backdoor used exlcusively by law enforcement compromised the entirety of the US phone network and possibly resulted in all US lawmakers phone calls being monitored by foreign agents.

This isn’t exactly related but this video from The Privacy Guides is a good overview in my opninion.
But in this case the encryption was “bypassed” due to the backdoor and the government’s ability to abuse it was compromised.

As a third. The Exploit that resulted in the WannaCry randsomware attack is suspected to have been stolen from the NSA before being used by North Korea.
So an attack that crippled multiple European organisations occured because an organisation with (seemingly) far more funding than European equivalents couldn’t defend their own systems from foreign threats while maintaining tools used to compromise private devices. https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/learning/security/ransomware/wannacry-ransomware/

The main point from my perspective is that these systems where governments try to maintain some sort of access to private citizens systems have a history of being compromised, often by foreign governments with malicious intent.

1 Like
4

Organizations I believe already work on this for many years, but countries are still in the red. The slogan “Help stop #chatcontrol” appeals to EU citizens to take action. Its difficult (complex) to contact politicians, so this post is another attempt to make it simpler, and about spreading awareness, because there is little awareness still in general population (outside of countries like Germany, which have stronger privacy culture).

5

Why complex? Because material has to motivate politicians to take action, otherwise they will ignore it, because they have tons of other important things to do (and those things are which people & journalists most talk about day to day)

What exact action politician would take? They would talk to their colleagues and convince its important, so official position of government could change. They need to understand the issue to explain others. Which is complex again.

For example - its difficult for us (who care about privacy the most) to understand this or take action, so likewise its not simple for politicians to understand this issue and take action too, or explain others is another level of difficulty.